Page anatomy
| Surface | What to read |
|---|
| Classification and style chips | Independent, creator-focused, entry-heavy or exit-heavy activity plus descriptive execution style such as scalp, DCA, ladder exits or variable sizing. |
| Overall score and status | Zero-to-100 score for rateable accounts and Candidate, Watch or High Risk status; a dash and explicit reason appear when no rating is allowed. |
| Five component cards | Profit Quality, Robustness, Copyability, Trading Purity and Sample Confidence. |
| Rating eligibility | Every data-completeness, independence, sample-size, economic and coverage condition needed before scoring. |
| Candidate gates | Extra outcome and concentration rules a rateable result must pass to receive Candidate. |
| Warnings | Concentration, coverage or execution caveats that should be considered alongside the headline score. |
| Six diagnostics | Position reconstruction, raw profit quality, reliability and concentration, risk and capital, copyability and execution, and trading purity and coverage. |
How to use the result
- Start with the classification and Rating eligibility panel. A missing score is intentional when the account is not independent, the sample is too small or required coverage is incomplete.
- Treat the overall score as a summary only. Component cards identify whether a result is driven by profit, stability, ease of copying, clean evidence or sample size.
- Candidate gates are stricter than rating eligibility. An account can be rateable and still be Watch or High Risk.
- Read Reliability & Concentration and Raw Risk & Capital before interpreting a high return; they expose dependence on a top winner, bootstrap stability, drawdown and tail loss.
- Open the Positions tab to trace summary metrics back to individual mints and see why cycles were eligible or excluded.
Score components
| Component | Weight | Primary question |
|---|
| Profit Quality | 30% | Were reconstructed returns economically positive and supported by a favorable loss profile? |
| Robustness | 25% | Does performance persist across resampling, time and removal of the largest winner? |
| Copyability | 20% | Are timing, burst behavior, sizing, entries and exits practical to reproduce? |
| Trading Purity | 15% | How much eligible evidence remains after creator-owned, unknown-quote, censored and cashback-dependent activity? |
| Sample Confidence | 10% | Is there enough eligible completed-position and active-hour evidence? |
Statuses before and after rating
| Status | Interpretation |
|---|
| Pending | Today inputs or required quote conversions are still loading or unavailable. |
| Insufficient History | Zero to nine eligible completed positions. |
| Preliminary | Ten to 19 eligible completed positions. |
| Not Rateable | A coverage or economic gate failed, or the activity classification is not independent trading. |
| Candidate | A rateable account with a score of at least 70 that passes every positive-P&L, concentration, profit-factor, and largest-winner hard gate. |
| High Risk | A rateable account whose score is below 50, raw P&L is non-positive, or profit factor is below one. |
| Watch | Rateable result that is neither Candidate nor High Risk. |
Evidence and limitations
The on-page methodology describes the current Today Review version, while the separate calculation reference provides the exact reconstruction and gating formulas. The review excludes Pump AMM and other venues, unobserved transfers, network and priority fees, validator tips, open-position market value, follower latency, slippage and liquidity capacity. It is retained-event analysis, not financial advice or a prediction.
